US states sue to block Trump tariffs impacting dozens of countries
BBC World
BBC World
Original Source
Twenty-five U.S. states have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging sweeping tariffs imposed on dozens of nations under the pretext of combating forced labour. The states argue the decision is arbitrary and exceeds the administration's legal authority.
Twenty-five states sued President Donald Trump's administration on Monday over a wave of tariffs against dozens of countries.
The US says the tariffs, which range between 10% and 12.5%, were imposed due to trading partners - including the UK, China and the European Union - failing to properly tackle forced labour.
In a legal document seen by the BBC, the coalition of Democratic states said the decision was "arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law".
In response, White House spokesman Kush Desai said the US was "using its lawful authority" to address practices that burden American businesses.
Desai added that any foreign countries failing to deal with the importation of goods produced with forced labour was "unreasonable" and must be addressed.
The new tariffs, which came into effect in July, were imposed under Section 301 of the 1974 US Trade Act, legislation which is designed to target nations that use forced labour.
The duties cover 99.4% of US imports, according to the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR).
During Trump's first term, he used Section 301 to impose trade tariffs on China and they survived challenges in court.
Desai added: "Section 301 tariffs have proven to be a legally durable tool since the president's first term, and they remain so now."
The lawsuit said the Trump administration "cannot use forced labour as a pretext to continue its illegal tariff scheme".
"The tariffs the USTR imposed are so broad that they defy the USTR's own stated aims and make a mockery of the statute used to justify them," it said.
The lawsuit added that the last time Trump used Section 301 to impose tariffs, solely targeting China in 2018, officials had investigated claims of forced labour in the country for eight months.
That compares with just two months for the most recent probe, which looked into 60 trading partners, it said.
"Typically, a Section 301 investigation into even a single economy takes much longer to complete," it argued.
The US says the tariffs, which range between 10% and 12.5%, were imposed due to trading partners - including the UK, China and the European Union - failing to properly tackle forced labour.
In a legal document seen by the BBC, the coalition of Democratic states said the decision was "arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law".
In response, White House spokesman Kush Desai said the US was "using its lawful authority" to address practices that burden American businesses.
Desai added that any foreign countries failing to deal with the importation of goods produced with forced labour was "unreasonable" and must be addressed.
The new tariffs, which came into effect in July, were imposed under Section 301 of the 1974 US Trade Act, legislation which is designed to target nations that use forced labour.
The duties cover 99.4% of US imports, according to the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR).
During Trump's first term, he used Section 301 to impose trade tariffs on China and they survived challenges in court.
Desai added: "Section 301 tariffs have proven to be a legally durable tool since the president's first term, and they remain so now."
The lawsuit said the Trump administration "cannot use forced labour as a pretext to continue its illegal tariff scheme".
"The tariffs the USTR imposed are so broad that they defy the USTR's own stated aims and make a mockery of the statute used to justify them," it said.
The lawsuit added that the last time Trump used Section 301 to impose tariffs, solely targeting China in 2018, officials had investigated claims of forced labour in the country for eight months.
That compares with just two months for the most recent probe, which looked into 60 trading partners, it said.
"Typically, a Section 301 investigation into even a single economy takes much longer to complete," it argued.
🔗 Share Article
Tags:#الولايات المتحدة#الرسوم الجمركية#ترامب#العمل القسري#التجارة الدولية#قضايا قانونية
Source: BBC World
For Context
Related reads from the same topic or latest developments
