Mourinho and chaos - is Real Madrid boss misunderstood?

Barcelona fans have long teased Jose Mourinho, with their insult of choice being traductor - Spanish for translator.

It is their way of mocking the Real Madrid manager's humble beginnings.

Learning his future trade while serving as an interpreter for the legendary Sir Bobby Robson, Mourinho followed Robson from Sporting to Porto, before the pair reached Barcelona in 1996.

Four years later Mourinho was the manager of Benfica, the first steps in a coaching career that would lead him to Champions League glory, twice, and success in England, Italy and Spain.

So much more than merely a translator, even while at Barcelona, the Portuguese boss' wide and varied success best illustrates the true qualities that underpin him - diligent, determined, introspective, able to thrive in chaos, and tactically brilliant.

Last weekend, that eager tactical mind was in full force as Real Madrid beat Barcelona 2-1.

As the footballing world praised the tactics Mourinho used, it was an apt moment to reflect on his 26 years in management.

This Clasico featured Real Madrid playing in a 4-4-2 shape with winger Vinicius Jr suspended.

Federico Valverde played at right-back. Bernardo Silva came into the side partnering Aurelien Tchouameni in midfield. Arda Guler and Yan Diomande manned the flanks and Jude Bellingham played up top alongside Kylian Mbappe.

Like he has often done in big games, Mourinho asked one of his more industrious players, Silva on this occasion, to man-mark Barcelona's Pedri. Not an easy task, but it was one that minimised the Spaniard's influence.

Masterminding individual wins in big games tend to garner Mourinho warranted praise, but his wider approach does not always get the recognition it probably deserves.

In recent years, coaches with more clearly defined tactics, patterns of play, or fixed positional references have been lauded as the geniuses of the sport.

Mourinho hasn't taken this approach, opting for one that leans on the quality of his players and tactics that look different depending on the club he finds himself leading.

This less fixed style is more difficult to analyse from the outside looking in, which can result in misunderstanding his work entirely.

Mourinho is a follower of tactical periodisation, a way of football thinking pioneered by Vitor Frade.

While Mourinho was working alongside Robson at Porto in the mid-1990s, Frade was also part of the coaching staff.

Pulling on threads from psychology, sociology, neuroscience, and systems theory, Frade's thinking rejected the common belief that technical, tactical, physical and psychological parts of football should be treated as separate things.

Part of the thinking behind this was that these factors were not drawn on separately in a match but instead all at once.

When Mourinho took charge of Real for this season, the Athletic reported that training sessions had become shorter but more intense, always carrying a focus on the ball.

Even getting players match fit was a job done with the ball at their feet.

In recent seasons, there has been a rise in man-to-man pressing which has removed the ability for teams to find overloads. Pressing puts pressure on the attackers on the ball which hurries their decisions, too.

This has made games look more chaotic, which may be to Mourinho's benefit.

Students of Frade believe chaos is inseparable from the game. By training in a holistic manner, the hope is that players become better equipped to solve problems on the fly.

Perhaps this is why Mourinho's teams have typically thrived in difficult conditions, as underdogs, when the stakes have been high, or when games move away from pre-planned patterns.

Mourinho doesn't seek to control every decision his players make but instead looks to prepare them to find solutions for themselves; with better players, these solutions should, in theory, be better.