‘It's put up or shut up time’: Battleground Republicans want the Darline treatment

‘It's put up or shut up time’: Battleground Republicans want the Darline treatment - POLITICO

Skip to Main Content

* + Europe
+ Pro
+ E&E News
+ AgencyIQ

Press Escape to close the menu.

WASHINGTON & POLITICS

WASHINGTON & POLITICS 6 items

* 1st item
Congress
* 2nd item
White House
* 3rd item
Supreme Court and Legal Issues
* 4th item
Magazine
* 5th item
2026 Elections
* 6th item
Latest on POLITICO

STATE POLITICS & POLICY

STATE POLITICS & POLICY 4 items

* 1st item
California
* 2nd item
Florida
* 3rd item
New Jersey
* 4th item
New York

GLOBAL POLITICS & POLICY

GLOBAL POLITICS & POLICY 6 items

* 1st item
Brussels
* 2nd item
Canada
* 3rd item
United Kingdom
* 4th item
France
* 5th item
Germany
* 6th item
Australia

POLICY NEWS

POLICY NEWS 11 items

* 1st item
Food and Agriculture
* 2nd item
Cybersecurity
* 3rd item
Defense
* 4th item
Education
* 5th item
Energy and Climate
* 6th item
Tax, Finance and the Economy
* 7th item
Health Care
* 8th item
Labor
* 9th item
Tech
* 10th item
Trade
* 11th item
Transportation

NEWSLETTERS

NEWSLETTERS 6 items

* 1st item
Playbook
* 2nd item
West Wing Playbook
* 3rd item
Inside Congress
* 4th item
POLITICO Forecast
* 5th item
POLITICO Magazine
* 6th item
All Newsletters

COLUMNISTS

COLUMNISTS 7 items

* 1st item
Alex Burns
* 2nd item
Victoria Guida
* 3rd item
John Harris
* 4th item
Debra Kahn
* 5th item
Jonathan Martin
* 6th item
Nahal Toosi
* 7th item
All Columnists

SERIES & MORE

SERIES & MORE 7 items

* 1st item
Inside Congress Live
* 2nd item
Breaking News Alerts
* 3rd item
Podcasts
* 4th item
Video
* 5th item
Matt Wuerker Cartoons
* 6th item
Cartoon Carousel
* 7th item
The POLITICO Poll

POLITICO Live

POLITICO Live 1 item

* 1st item
Events

Follow us

* X
* Instagram
* Facebook
* LinkedIn

* My Account
* Log In

‘It's put up or shut up time’: Battleground Republicans want the Darline treatment

The president went to great lengths to push his candidate over the finish line in South Carolina, but Republicans want the same support in races that will actually determine control of Congress.

!President Donald Trump dances as he departs a campaign rally.

*President Donald Trump dances as he departs a campaign rally for Sen. Darline Graham (R-S.C.) in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, on Aug. 21, 2026.

|

Jacquelyn Martin/AP*

By Alec Hernandez and Aaron Pellish

08/25/2026 11:49 PM EDT

President Donald Trump notched a major win on Tuesday night. Republicans in battlegrounds wonder if it was the best use of his time and money.

Sen. Darline Graham defeated Rep. Ralph Norman in South Carolina’s snap Senate GOP runoff, handing Trump a revitalizing win after several of his endorsed candidates fell in recent primaries.

It was a victory that Graham, a complete political unknown six weeks ago, could not have pulled off without Trump’s steadfast support, underscoring just how much his influence still matters among the Republican electorate in the deeply conservative state.

But South Carolina’s Senate seat will not dictate the balance of power in Washington, and GOP strategists working on critical swing state campaigns are eager for Trump to finally direct his attention to them.

“The message coming out of this is that obviously the president’s support is still super powerful. The president’s operation still has the ability to move the needle in a lot of these states,” said a Republican strategist working on several battleground races, including in Georgia, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly about Trump’s involvement. “Hopefully, this is a sign of things to come that the president is willing to get involved and really start to move the needle in some other places that obviously matter a little bit more than South Carolina.”

Trump’s persistent backing of Graham defined the race: He championed her appointment to her late brother Sen. Lindsey Graham’s seat, he coaxed her into the race with an early endorsement, stood by her as she stumbled on the debate stage, and flew down to Myrtle Beach for a rare political rally that few of his chosen candidates have enjoyed this cycle. MAGA Inc., Trump’s behemoth super PAC, even spent a slice of highly sought after cash from its $400 million stockpile in the closing days of the race.

And yet, the president hasn’t taken a meaningful step into the states that will matter in a few short months — even as battleground Republicans have been clamoring for him to spend his MAGA Inc. money.

“It’s now or never. It’s put up or shut up time, and it’s really time to start to see if he’s going to get serious,” the GOP strategist said. “You’ve got September and October to really move the needle here, and it just doesn’t seem like there’s any sense of urgency, or like we understand that we are down big in some of these states.”

During her victory speech in Columbia, Graham acknowledged Trump’s heavy hand: “Our victory would not have been possible without you, and we are truly grateful,” Graham said of the president. “South Carolina is truly Trump country.”

Norman’s take on the president’s participation was not as rosy: “The president got involved. He has that right. That’s his prerogative,” Norman said in his concession speech Tuesday, prompting jeers from the crowd at his election night watch party. “Y’all,” he continued, “his policies are good. I never understood why he got in this race. It is what it is, and I’ll accept it.”

Norman’s bewilderment reflected several national and South Carolina Republicans’ confusion as to why the president would expend energy for the safe Republican seat when his MAGA allies like Mike Collins in Georgia, scandal-plagued Ken Paxton in Texas and Michael Whatley in North Carolina are facing tough Senate battles against Democratic opponents.

“There’s the principle,” said a North Carolina-based GOP strategist who was granted anonymity to speak candidly about the battleground picture. “If you’re not Trump and you have these people shoved down your throat, you’re like, ‘Okay, are you gonna help?’”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Some Republicans are worried that though Trump helped power Graham’s win, the president’s overall unpopularity may be more of a curse than a boon in any highly competitive battleground state. A series of Trump-backed candidates lost gubernatorial and congressional primaries in recent weeks, including in Georgia and Iowa.

Republicans overall are facing a tough election environment given the ongoing and unpopular war in Iran, backlash to the administration’s highly-visible deportation agenda and voters’ persistent cost of living concerns.

“You have a president and maybe even a vice president that are just so underwater politically in the polls, that they might be a help by not intervening,” said Matthew Bartlett, a GOP strategist and former State Department official in the first Trump administration.

Still, Trump swept the battlegrounds in 2024, and his ability to boost Graham despite her foreign policy debate gaffe and questions about her political inexperience serves as a reminder of his electoral prowess to campaign officials.

The question remains when — or if — he’ll throw them a presidential life raft.

Watch: The Conversation

How Jonathan Haidt turned the fight over kids and social media into a political movement

Video Player is loading.

This overlay will show up while the video is playing

Current Time

0:00

/

Duration

\-:-:-

Loaded

: 0%

0:00:00

Stream Type

LIVE

Remaining Time

\-

\-:-:-

1x

* 2x
* 1.75x
* 1.5x
* 1.25x
* 1x
, selected
* 0.75x
* 0.5x

* Chapters

* descriptions off
, selected

* captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
* captions off
, selected

* default
, selected

How Jonathan Haidt turned the fight over kids and social media into a political movement

“I wouldn’t count on the money if I were in these states,” said the North Carolina-based Republican strategist. “He still could. I’m just saying, I wouldn’t count on it. We’