Supreme Court rejects bid to revive Missouri’s pro-GOP redistricting before midterms

Missouri’s redistricting in flux after conflicting court rulings - POLITICO

Skip to Main Content

* + Europe
+ Pro
+ AgencyIQ

Press Escape to close the menu.

WASHINGTON & POLITICS

WASHINGTON & POLITICS 6 items

* 1st item
Congress
* 2nd item
White House
* 3rd item
Supreme Court and Legal Issues
* 4th item
Magazine
* 5th item
2026 Elections
* 6th item
Latest on POLITICO

STATE POLITICS & POLICY

STATE POLITICS & POLICY 4 items

* 1st item
California
* 2nd item
Florida
* 3rd item
New Jersey
* 4th item
New York

GLOBAL POLITICS & POLICY

GLOBAL POLITICS & POLICY 6 items

* 1st item
Brussels
* 2nd item
Canada
* 3rd item
United Kingdom
* 4th item
France
* 5th item
Germany
* 6th item
Australia

POLICY NEWS

POLICY NEWS 11 items

* 1st item
Food and Agriculture
* 2nd item
Cybersecurity
* 3rd item
Defense
* 4th item
Education
* 5th item
Energy and Climate
* 6th item
Tax, Finance and the Economy
* 7th item
Health Care
* 8th item
Labor
* 9th item
Tech
* 10th item
Trade
* 11th item
Transportation

NEWSLETTERS

NEWSLETTERS 6 items

* 1st item
Playbook
* 2nd item
West Wing Playbook
* 3rd item
Inside Congress
* 4th item
POLITICO Forecast
* 5th item
POLITICO Magazine
* 6th item
All Newsletters

COLUMNISTS

COLUMNISTS 7 items

* 1st item
Alex Burns
* 2nd item
Victoria Guida
* 3rd item
John Harris
* 4th item
Debra Kahn
* 5th item
Jonathan Martin
* 6th item
Nahal Toosi
* 7th item
All Columnists

SERIES & MORE

SERIES & MORE 7 items

* 1st item
Inside Congress Live
* 2nd item
Breaking News Alerts
* 3rd item
Podcasts
* 4th item
Video
* 5th item
Matt Wuerker Cartoons
* 6th item
Cartoon Carousel
* 7th item
The POLITICO Poll

POLITICO Live

POLITICO Live 1 item

* 1st item
Events

Follow us

* X
* Instagram
* Facebook
* LinkedIn

* My Account
* Log In

Missouri’s redistricting in flux after conflicting court rulings

A Supreme Court justice rejected a bid to revive Missouri’s pro-GOP redistricting before midterms, but a federal judge practically simultaneously gave the state the OK to continue with the plan.

!Steve Perry holds a sign outside the Missouri state Capitol.

*Steve Perry, of Kansas City, holds a sign in opposition to Missouri’s congressional redistricting plan on Sept. 2, 2026, outside the state Capitol, in Jefferson City, Missouri.

|

David A. Lieb/AP*

By Josh Gerstein and Aaron Pellish

09/08/2026 06:09 PM EDT

|

Updated:09/08/2026 08:08 PM EDT

Add POLITICO on Google

A Republican-led bid to revive a redistricting plan that favors the GOP fell short at the Supreme Court Tuesday, but it later picked up steam after a federal judge in Missouri ruled that officials must move ahead with the districts used in primaries last month — a map that’s likely to net Republicans an additional House seat.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh turned down a Republican-backed emergency appeal that sought to block a Missouri Supreme Court ruling last week restoring earlier district lines and ordering that voters to weigh in on the redistricting plan in November for use in future elections.

However, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Stephen Clark, in a decision made public within minutes of Kavanaugh’s ruling, issued a temporary restraining order that effectively set aside the state Supreme Court’s decision and granted Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins’ request to move forward with the plan likely to elect a Republican in one of the state’s two districts currently held by Democrats.

The conflicting rulings add another layer of chaos to Missouri’s election administration. Local election officials had prepared for months as the debate over which map to use moved through the court system, planning for elections in the event either map gets used. The state used the new, gerrymandered map for August’s primaries.

The timing of settling these legal disputes is crucial. The rulings came hours before the Tuesday deadline for Missouri election officials to make changes to any ballots, and ballots must be finalized before Sept. 19.

Kavanaugh issued his ruling because he handles urgent matters arising in the 8th Circuit, which includes Missouri. Kavanaugh issued no explanation of his decision, nor did he indicate that he had referred the matter to the full court, as is customary in significant cases. Missouri officials could ask another justice for relief, but such requests are almost never granted.

The justices rarely disturb state courts’ decisions about matters like the referendum petitions in Missouri that sought to put the redistricting before voters for approval.

Clark, a St. Louis-based Trump appointee, said two Republican candidates who sued were likely to prevail in their arguments that changing the district lines at this point in the process would violate two provisions in the U.S. Constitution: one establishing the House of Representatives and another guaranteeing equal protection of the laws.

Lawyers for state officials warned in their appeal to the Supreme Court that the state faced “disaster” and “unprecedented chaos” in part because primaries already took place under the new lines last month.

Democrats argued any last-minute chaos to Missouri’s election administration was intentionally created by Hoskins, pointing to Republican leaders in the state arguing that delaying the decision on the redistricting referendum would benefit Republicans.

President Donald Trump denounced the state Supreme Court ruling last week.

“The Election Process, as usual, is being disturbed in America!” he wrote in a post on Truth Social. “Missouri must be able to use the map that was in effect just a couple of months ago, in the Primary. This is a Dark Day for “Justice” in Missouri!”

* Redistricting
* Midterms
* Missouri
* Brett Kavanaugh
* 2026 Elections

POLITICO Forecast

Global power is in flux. Your daily guide to what comes next.

* About Us
* Advertising
* Breaking News Alerts
* Careers
* Credit Card Payments
* FAQ
* Feedback
* Headlines
* Photos
* Press
* Request A Correction
* Write For Us
* RSS
* Site Map
* Terms of Service
* Privacy Policy
* Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information and Opt Out of Targeted Advertising

---

© 2026 POLITICO LLC