Democrats found their border message. ICE is another story.

Democrats found their border message. ICE is another story. - POLITICO

Skip to Main Content

* + Europe
+ Pro
+ E&E News
+ AgencyIQ

Press Escape to close the menu.

WASHINGTON & POLITICS

WASHINGTON & POLITICS 6 items

* 1st item
Congress
* 2nd item
White House
* 3rd item
Supreme Court and Legal Issues
* 4th item
Magazine
* 5th item
2026 Elections
* 6th item
Latest on POLITICO

STATE POLITICS & POLICY

STATE POLITICS & POLICY 4 items

* 1st item
California
* 2nd item
Florida
* 3rd item
New Jersey
* 4th item
New York

GLOBAL POLITICS & POLICY

GLOBAL POLITICS & POLICY 6 items

* 1st item
Brussels
* 2nd item
Canada
* 3rd item
United Kingdom
* 4th item
France
* 5th item
Germany
* 6th item
Australia

POLICY NEWS

POLICY NEWS 11 items

* 1st item
Food and Agriculture
* 2nd item
Cybersecurity
* 3rd item
Defense
* 4th item
Education
* 5th item
Energy and Climate
* 6th item
Tax, Finance and the Economy
* 7th item
Health Care
* 8th item
Labor
* 9th item
Tech
* 10th item
Trade
* 11th item
Transportation

NEWSLETTERS

NEWSLETTERS 6 items

* 1st item
Playbook
* 2nd item
West Wing Playbook
* 3rd item
Inside Congress
* 4th item
POLITICO Forecast
* 5th item
POLITICO Magazine
* 6th item
All Newsletters

COLUMNISTS

COLUMNISTS 7 items

* 1st item
Alex Burns
* 2nd item
Victoria Guida
* 3rd item
John Harris
* 4th item
Debra Kahn
* 5th item
Jonathan Martin
* 6th item
Nahal Toosi
* 7th item
All Columnists

SERIES & MORE

SERIES & MORE 7 items

* 1st item
Inside Congress Live
* 2nd item
Breaking News Alerts
* 3rd item
Podcasts
* 4th item
Video
* 5th item
Matt Wuerker Cartoons
* 6th item
Cartoon Carousel
* 7th item
The POLITICO Poll

POLITICO Live

POLITICO Live 1 item

* 1st item
Events

Follow us

* X
* Instagram
* Facebook
* LinkedIn

* My Account
* Log In

Democrats found their border message. ICE is another story.

They’re trying to balance a base furious at ICE with swing voters wary of abolishing the agency — a divide that could influence the midterms and the party’s path in 2028.

!A person holds a sign reading "Abolish ICE" as NYPD Strategic Response Group officers keep watch over people protesting against an earlier raid by federal agents outside of 26 Federal Plaza on Oct. 21, 2025 in New York City.

*A person holds a sign reading "Abolish ICE" as NYPD Strategic Response Group officers keep watch over people protesting against an earlier raid by federal agents outside of 26 Federal Plaza on Oct. 21, 2025 in New York City.

|

Adam Gray/Getty Images*

By Samuel Benson, Lisa Kashinsky and Eric Bazail-Eimil

08/22/2026 10:00 AM EDT

Democrats have figured out how to talk about the border. They still haven’t reached a consensus on ICE.

In battlegrounds across the country, moderate and progressive Democrats alike are calling for a secure border and admitting the Biden administration’s policy there led to political backlash in 2024. But with less than three months until Election Day, they still aren’t on the same page in how far to go in reining in Immigration and Customs Enforcement — with some high-profile candidates pushing reforms, and others calling to dissolve the agency altogether.

Many in the party see an opening: Half of Americans view President Donald Trump’s deportation push as too aggressive. But some Democrats are starting to worry that going too far on ICE could again kneecap their electoral chances in key battlegrounds now and in the future.

“The party is still struggling to get its footing on this issue and talk to voters about this,” said Daniel Delgado, a senior career Department of Homeland Security official who left the department after Trump took office in 2025 and now works as a senior fellow at the center-left Searchlight Institute think tank in Washington. “Trump’s actions are pushing people to adopt a more extreme position, but reform is what’s sticking with voters in the middle.”

Democratic candidates are pulled between a fired-up base that wants to see ICE abolished or dramatically reined in, and an undecided voter bloc that’s much less likely to support drastic measures — all while continuing to distance themselves from the Biden administration’s border policies that become political kryptonite for Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 race.

A new POLITICO Poll — conducted by Public First between Aug. 8 to 12 — found that just 21 percent of undecided midterm voters say they support abolishing ICE, while 51 percent of self-described moderate Democrats and 67 percent of progressive Democrats say they do.

Those findings track with other polling this year from Navigator Research and NBC News/SurveyMonkey that found Democrats are much more likely than independents to support abolishing ICE, though support for full abolition falls across all groups when respondents are given the option to “reform” the agency.

“A Democratic primary electorate represents less than 25 percent of general election voters,” said Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha, a former Bernie Sanders campaign veteran now advising Texas state Rep. James Talarico’s Senate campaign and numerous other candidates this cycle. “The electorate is really pissed, and the Democratic electorate has been very energized, but also these are different electorates from state-to-state.”

Battleground candidates running in border states like Arizona and Texas are calling for ICE officers to be held accountable and guardrails to be installed for the agency — like Talarico, who wants ICE to focus on violent criminals and be banned from using face coverings. Meanwhile, progressive nominees in key Senate contests in Maine and Michigan say the agency is beyond saving, and have used the potent catchphrase “abolish ICE.”

The intraparty divide was on display in Austin last weekend, where Democratic National Committee members could not reach a consensus on whether ICE should be abolished or reformed, eventually approving dueling resolutions that called for both.

That disunity comes as Democrats’ 2028 path to the White House will run straight through two early primary states with significant Hispanic populations — Nevada and border-state New Mexico — all but guaranteeing that immigration enforcement will be a central point of contention.

Immigration enforcement is an issue where Democrats in 2024 “really missed the opportunity to be who we are: smart, fair, and can deliver aggressively through Congress the things that really make a difference. And we couldn’t say it. We didn’t deal with it,” said New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, who has called for more accountability regarding ICE but argues abolishing it is not a winning message. “Shame on us then. We better not make these mistakes again — now, in ’26, in the midterms, and certainly not in 28.”

Some of the party’s battleground Senate nominees, even as they support securing the border, see a path to victory with an abolish-ICE message.

Troy Jackson, Democrats’ nominee in Maine, called to eliminate the agency in response to a federal immigration agent killing a man in the state in July and has used the incident to hammer his opponent, GOP Sen. Susan Collins, for voting to further fund ICE.

And Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed has called to abolish ICE and likened the agency’s hardline tactics to “normalizing paramilitary force.”

“There’s no question we need a safe, secure southern border. And there’s also no question that we have a responsibility to enforce immigration policy, but to do that in a way that does not supersede the Constitution itself,” El-Sayed said in an interview.

But he also acknowledged “different communities” around the country “are going to think differently about these things.”

Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, the Democratic nominee for Senate, has avoided explicitly calling to abolish ICE, but has tiptoed up to the line: “We need to rip ICE apart,” she said in her primary-night victory speech. She won a hard-fought primary in Minnesota’s Senate race by castigating her D